HISTORICAL INTERESTS

 Early Promoters of the 'Persistence of Vision'

 Sergei Eisenstein & Dziga Vertov

 

Comparison of Early Filmmakers' Contributions to Editing with Today's Editing Process

Sergei Eisenstein and Dziga Vertov were pioneers in film editing and significantly contributed to shaping how we perceive and interpret films today. Their innovations, particularly in montage and editing techniques, laid the groundwork for many of the strategies employed in modern filmmaking. However, the editing processes of their time were rooted in conceptual experimentation and a quest for emotional impact, which contrasts with the more technologically advanced and streamlined editing methods we use today.

​

Eisenstein's Montage vs. Today's Montage Techniques

​

Sergei Eisenstein, often regarded as the father of visual construction and form, revolutionized editing by developing the concept of montage. Eisenstein believed combining shots could create new meanings and provoke emotions in the viewer. His approach opposed traditional continuity editing, which focused on seamless transitions between shots to maintain the illusion of time and space. Instead, he embraced non-continuity editing, where juxtaposed shots could evoke a robust emotional response, similar to how individual brushstrokes in Japanese calligraphy create a cohesive image and meaning. This concept is best demonstrated in his film Strike, where unrelated shots are woven together to form a single, impactful theme.

​

In contrast, today's montage is still rooted in Eisenstein's ideas, but the process has become faster and more precise with technological advancements and editing software. Modern editors use digital tools to create complex sequences that still rely on the juxtaposition of shots to convey emotional or thematic shifts. However, the cutting-edge capabilities of today's editing software allow for greater flexibility, including real-time editing, 3D effects, and seamless transitions that Eisenstein could not have imagined.

​

Vertov's "Persistence of Vision" and Documentary Techniques

​

Dziga Vertov's approach to editing was grounded in the concept of persistence of vision, the phenomenon where the human eye retains an image for a short time after it disappears. Vertov used this principle to arrange shots to influence the viewer's emotional and intellectual response. In his 1922 manifesto, Vertov explained that he was "Kino-eye," a creator who shaped the film's narrative by carefully selecting and arranging images. His film A Man with a Movie Camera is a prime example of this technique, where he used fast and slow motion, jump cuts, and other techniques to capture the rhythm of daily life in a city. Vertov's documentary style was unique for its time, as it aimed to present reality without staging or rehearsing the scenes.

​

Today, Vertov's concept of persistence of vision still informs documentary filmmaking, though modern technology has expanded the tools available to documentary filmmakers. Digital cameras and editing software allow for more sophisticated manipulation of images, such as enhanced color grading, digital stabilization, and high-definition slow motion. While the core idea of conveying truth and reality remains central to many documentaries today, the precision and ease with which filmmakers can manipulate footage in post-production has transformed how these films are made.

​

Legacy of Eisenstein and Vertov in Modern Editing

​

Both Eisenstein and Vertov were instrumental in shaping the editing techniques we use today, particularly in how we manipulate the viewer's perception through the arrangement of shots. The principles they pioneered—such as montage, persistence of vision, and the emotional power of editing—continue to influence filmmakers. In modern cinema, editors build upon these foundational ideas, using advanced editing software to create complex emotional and narrative structures. However, the tools at their disposal today—such as non-linear editing systems (NLE), digital compositing, and CGI—allow for far more experimentation and precision than the manual splicing and physical film editing techniques used by Eisenstein and Vertov.

​

While Eisenstein's emphasis on emotional manipulation through shot juxtaposition and Vertov's documentary realism remain relevant, modern editing now benefits from the seamless integration of digital tools. This shift has made editing more accessible, efficient, and capable of delivering even more nuanced and intricate visual experiences. Today's editors are still guided by the same principles of visual storytelling that Eisenstein and Vertov championed, but they work within a vastly different technological landscape, allowing them to push the boundaries of what was once thought possible.

In conclusion, while the editing process has evolved drastically since the days of Eisenstein and Vertov, their foundational concepts still resonate in the techniques used today. The manipulation of time, space, and emotion through editing continues to be at the core of compelling filmmaking, albeit with the aid of modern technology that offers unprecedented control and precision.